|
THERESE OF LISIEUX
by Hans Urs von Balthasar
Part III - Chapter:
THE LITTLE WAY

This chapter may
open up the depth of the teaching of Saint Therese on the "little
way" in a whole new and exciting way! Hans Urs von Balthsar
shows just how radical, innovative this little saint is, and
yet how traditional and how rooted in the Catholic vision. It
is my own opinion that this book on Therese, just one chapter
of which is reproduced here, may have contributed greatly to
the ultimate decision made by our Pope, John Paul II, to declare
Saint Therese a "Doctor/Teacher of the Universal Church." Her
doctrine goes to the heart of the Gospel, and
perhaps not all have really discovered its riches yet.... and
it is my joy to make this available:
Every Christian
-- and, much more, every saint -- lives theological truths;
his life is an expression of the Gospel teaching whose kernel
is found in the unity of truth and life. Therese's mission goes
beyond this; it is, in the Pope's words, an explicitly doctrinal
mission. It was God's purpose for Therese to light up certain
aspects of revelation afresh for the benefit of contemporary
Christendom, to make certain accepted but neglected truths astonishingly
clear. She herself was aware of this doctrinal mission and she
does not hesitate to underline its significance.
When she
was still a child at the Abbey School the Abbe called her "my
little Church doctor", because she was always ready with a good
answer. Her intensely conscious mind inevitably led her to it.
Yet it was not on her own initiative that she formulated her
own teaching in the convent. This teaching took form later,
and almost by chance; its dominant themes do not appear before
1893, five years after her entry. But then she quickly realizes
that she has a mission to teach.
Marie had
expressed a desire to get to know Therese's " little doctrine
", and T'herese adopts the expression and seeks to satisfy her
desire. But the eleventh chapter of the autobiography, which
she addresses to Marie, is not the first one containing her
teaching; there are the elements of it in the childhood reminiscences
written for Pauline, where she is not only describing and entertaining,
but above all instructing. And when Pius XI acknowledges that
she had received the gift of wisdom in a rare degree, he is
simply repeating what Therese said of herself: "How
is it, Mother, that my youth and my inexperience did not scare
you? How was it that you did not fear that I might let your
lambs stray? In acting as you did, perhaps you remembered that
the Lord often likes to give wisdom to the little ones . . .
Everyone is ready to admit of exceptions here below; only the
good God is not allowed this right! "
And Therese
then applies to herself the Psalmist's statement: "I
have understanding above old men." "You
did not even deem it imprudent, Mother, to tell me one day that
the divine Master was enlightening my soul and granting me the
experience of years. I am too little now to fall into vanity,
I am too little still to start coining beautiful phrases to
give the impression that I have a great deal of humility. I
would rather acknowledge simply that 'He that is mighty hath
done great things to me'."
Therefore
Marie de Gonzague, to whom these lines are addressed, has played
a part in quickening Therese's appreciation of this point. She
has no cause for surprise when she finds Therese giving her
lessons as well. "What I am saying to you
now, Mother, is very important." Indeed we even find
her writing a long and very understanding letter to her own
Prioress, instructing her as to how she may achieve indifference
of heart. She deliberately undertakes
spiritual direction, advises her relatives, and clarifies the
vocations of Leonie and Marie Guerin; she smooths the path for
Celine, step by step, and refers to her petite direction.
Even her
letters to her priest-brothers make it clear that with all her
respect for the pre-eminent dignity of the priesthood Therese
assumes the office of teacher and director in both their cases.
It is she who consoles and warns, encourages and praises, answers
their questions, confirms their opinions and lays down her little
way. "When I am come into harbor, I shall
instruct you, dear little Brother of my soul, how you must navigate
on the tempestuous sea of the world; with the love and utter
trustfulness of a child." When she reads over her manuscript
she becomes more convinced of its importance than when she was
actually composing it: "What I find written
in this notebook, Mother, that is really my soul. Mother, these
lines will do much good... I know that everyone will love me."
"After my death you should not discuss my
manuscript with anyone until it is published, if our Mother
is in agreement. If you do anything else the Devil will set
a trap for you to hinder and destroy the work of the good God,
and a most important work." She is sure of herself.
Her "little way" is derived straight from the Gospels as God
had interpreted them for her.
Even before
reading Surin and John of the Cross all
the elements of her doctrine are there and only need to be brought
into the brighter light of consciousness. P. Alexis, by confirming
that her views were fundamentally sound, had given her the Church's
official approval. Anne of Jesus, in her eyes the authentic
representative of Carmelite tradition, said she was "most content
" with her. That is enough. She does not need to know that her
doctrine also stands firmly in the lines of the best theological
and spiritual traditions.
If one takes
her sentences materially one can say that "in itself the doctrine
of our saint is neither new nor original "; but frequently one
has to go back centuries before finding teachers who have been
so bold, and have laid such emphasis on certain elementary truths
of Christ's teaching. Therese is by no means inclined, therefore,
to see her teaching minimized. Just as she herself placed the
doctrine of the Mystical Body at the center of her doctrine,
similarly she treats her doctrine as the heart
of theology. The way she is pointing is not one way amongst
others. It is the only way: "I know no other means of arriving at perfection save love..." "The
science of love. Oh... I desire that science alone... love is
the sole treasure that I covet. Jesus condescends to show me
the only way that leads to this divine furnace. It is the way
of a small child abandoning itself without fear in its father's
arms. 'Whosoever is a little one, let him come unto me',
was what the Holy Spirit said through the mouth of Solomon."
The only
way -- not because it is Therese's way, as opposed to the ways
of other theologians and ascetics, but because it is the way
of love which surpasses and includes all others. "That is everything which Jesus asks of us." In this sense
her teaching is just as new and unique as her mission. She feels
herself to be the bearer of something quite new. And a privileged
position is given to this new teaching: "Our
Lord once answered the mother of the sons of Zebedee, 'To
sit on my right or left hand, is not mine to give to you, but
to them for whom it is prepared by my Father'. I imagine
that these privileged places which were denied to the great
saints and martyrs will be granted to the little children. Did
not David prophesy it when he said, 'The little Benjamin
shall preside amidst the assemblies [of the saints]."
There is
even a sense in which Therese uses her
little way as her measure of the saints. "Theophane
Venard is a little saint, his life is quite ordinary."
"As soon as God sees us convinced of our
own nothingness -- He stretches out His hand to us; but if we
wish to attempt great things, even under the pretext of zeal,
He leaves us alone. It is sufficient therefore to humble oneself
and to bear our imperfections meekly: that is true sanctity."
The correctness
of her doctrine is self-evident for Therese. "Not
a single book, and no theology guided me, and yet I know in
the depths of my heart that I am within the truth."
And her conviction urges her, towards the end of her life, to
communicate these truths to everyone; continually we hear her:
"You must tell souls..." And she leads those whom God has
sent to her along her way; to the hesitant Belliere she
writes: "I feel that we must go to Heaven by the same road." "I see, even more clearly than in your other letters, that you are
barred from going to Heaven by any other way than your
poor little sister's."
Her teaching
is not a theological system of propositions held together by
inferences; it is an immediate, total vision, and on that account
requires many different forms for its exposition. And however
important it may be to understand the exposition it is even
more vital to grasp the original power of the vision. It is
a primitive Christian power following the primitive Christian
system of dying and rebirth, of death and resurrection, of pulling
down and building up. It is the power of God who has command
over the living and the dead. We find it in the Sermon on the
Mount, which in a series of lightning flashes annihilates every
tenet that contradicts divine truth -- the Pharisee with his
religion of good works brushed aside in favor of the poor and
the abandoned.
And again
in Paul's Gospel, the life that flowed from the death of Damascus.
It is the power of the Augustinian either/or: caritas or
cupiditas. It is the power of unconditional surrender
in Carmel. And this is the rhythm that must be at the back of
our minds as we listen to Therese's teaching.
DEMOLITION
By going
directly to the Gospel sources Therese joins with all her
force in Our Lord's initial movement: the demolition
of religious facades. The blazing passion with which
John the Baptist, in the spirit of Elias, clears the ground
to give the approaching Messiah room and air is itself only
a preparation for the absolute passion with which the Son flattens
every obstacle to the Father's glory. "Whoever
draws near me draws near to fire," runs one of Christ's
apocryphal sayings, and each of his words, his actions and his
miracles is fire -- a fire all the more consuming since it is
not the fire of justice but of love. And once God has cast this
fire upon earth he sends his saints to fan it into flame so
that it cannot be damped down in the hearths of a "bourgeois"
Christianity.
Therese of Lisieux also
cleanses the Temple with a whip. She is fearless and aggressive.
She loves war. She is a fighter by nature. "God
wanted to make me conquer the fortress of Carmel at the sword's
point." "Our Lord has granted me
the grace of being totally unafraid of war; I must do my duty,
whatever the cost." "Let us always
grasp the sword of the spirit... let us never simply allow matters
to take their course for the sake of our own peace; let us fight
without ceasing, even without hope of winning the battle. What
does success matter! Let us keep going, however exhausting the
struggle may be... One must do one's duty to the end."
"This morning I read a passage in the Gospel
where it is said, 'I come not to bring peace but a sword'.
All that remains for us then is to fight. When we have not the
strength, it is then that Jesus fights for us. Together let
us put the axe to the root of the tree..." "Sanctity! It has to be won at the point of the sword."
She speaks of "the
way to force Jesus to come to your help"; and asserts
that Victory will not come cheaply: "It
does not come in a day." But for all her failings there
is one quality she never lacks: "I am not always faithful, but I am never discouraged." "During
meditation I fell asleep for a moment. I dreamed that soldiers
were needed for a war. They said, we must send Therese of the
Child Jesus. I replied, I would prefer a holy war. But I went
all the same. 0 Mother, how gladly I would have fought in the
Crusades or later against the heretics. Certainly I should not
have feared the fire. Is it possible that I shall have
to die in bed?" "I am not a warrior
who has fought with earthly weapons but 'with the sword of
the spirit which is the Word of
God'. Consequently not even my sickness has
laid me low, and only yesterday evening I used my sword on a
novice. I said, I shall die weapon in hand."
And she teaches
the novices to do likewise. " I always want
to see you behaving like a brave soldier who does not complain
about his own suffering but takes his comrades' wounds seriously
and treats his own as nothing but scratches." And that
is how she herself behaves, on her death-bed, when she is burdened
with visitors. "I thought that I ought not
to want more rest than Our Lord. When He fled into the desert
after preaching, the people came and disturbed His solitude.
Come to me, as often as you like. I must die with my weapons
in my hand, in my mouth the sword
of the spirit which is the Word of God."
Therese is
convinced of the connection between holiness and energy. "In
order to be holy the most essential virtue is energy. With energy
one can easily reach the height of perfection." "Jesus
said that 'the Kingdom of Heaven suffers violence and the
violent take it by storm'." "You cannot be half a saint, you must be a whole saint or no saint
at all. I felt that you must have a soul of great energy, and
I was happy to become your Sister." This feature of Therese's
make-up explains her admiration for Judith. "I
have always been struck by the praise addressed to Judith, 'Thou
hast done manfully, and thy heart has been strengthened'.
At the beginning we must act courageously; then one's heart becomes bolder, and one marches to victory after victory."
Above all,
it explains the love and friendship for Joan of Arc which permeates
all her writing. In her early days she used to read chivalrous
stories with great enthusiasm, "...and through admiring the patriotic deeds of French heroines,
those of Joan of Arc in particular, I felt a great longing to
imitate them". And her attitude to Joan of Arc remains
absolutely unchanged even later, when she had come to realize
that her glory would not lie in external deeds. "When
I began to learn the history of France, the story of Joan of
Arc's exploits entranced me; I felt in my heart the desire and the courage to imitate
her; it seemed to me that Our Lord meant me for great things
too. I was not mistaken, but in place of voices from Heaven
calling me toWar, I heard in the depths of my soul a voice sweeter,
more powerful still, the voice of the Spouse of
Virgins calling me to other exploits, conquest more glorious, and
in the solitude of Carmel I realized that my mission was not
to get a mortal king crowned but to get the King of Heaven loved,
to bring the realm of hearts
under His sway."
Her numerous
poems and hymns in honor of Joan always celebrate her sanctity,
which forms the heart of her mission on the battlefield. In the "Shepherdess
of Domremy " the vocation to burning love and suffering is the
theme, in the "Victory Hymn for Joan of Arc" it is her firm
will to fight for Jesus in saving souls; in "Joan of Arc's Prayer
in Gaol " it is her memory of her free life in the world and
her longing for martyrdom. In "Joan's Voices during Martyrdom"
she describes the promised salvation of France through her vicarious
suffering; in the "Triumphant Song" she pictures her storming
heaven. At every turn Joan walks beside Therese. She wishes,
"like Joan of Arc, to murmur the name of Jesus at the burning stake
".
She compares
her mission to Joan's -- on seeing a picture of her in prison
she exclaims: "Your saints also encourage me in my prison. They say to me, 'As
long as you are in chains you cannot fulfill your mission; later,
after your death, your hour of victory
will strike... My mission will be accomplished according to
God's will, like Joan of Arc's, in spite of the envy of men."
"People pester me with questions; it reminds me of Joan of Arc before
the Inquisitors. I believe I am answering with the same uprightness."
Her "Prayer Inspired by a Picture of Joan of Arc" draws their
two missions together in the bonds of sisterly love:
"0
Lord God of Hosts, You have said in Your Gospel, 'I am not
come to bring peace but a sword'; arm me for the battle.
I long to fight for Your glory; but I beg You to uphold my courage
-- 0 my Beloved. I know what struggles You have prepared for
me; it is not on the battlefield that I shall fight... I am
the prisoner of Your love, I have freely riveted the fetters
which bind me to You and cut me off for ever from the world.
My sword is LOVE! With it I shall drive strangers from the
land, and shall have You proclaimed King over souls. It
is true, Lord, that You do not need such a weak instrument as
myself; but Joan, Your virginal and valiant Spouse, has said,
'We must do battle before God gives the victory'.
0 my Jesus, I shall fight for love of You until the evening of my
life."
Therese is a warrior even
though her battles are fought for love by means of love, for
peace by means of peace. Her war-like qualities simply bring
out new aspects of her action in the midst of contemplation.
And just as no action can be more effective than that contemplation
by which she inspires all forms of action in the Church, similarly
no battle can be fiercer and more final than the battle of love
which she conducts with the Sword of the Spirit.
Her battle is to wipe
out the hard core of Pharisaism which persists in the midst
of Christianity; that will-to-power disguised in the mantle
of religion, that drives one to assert one's own greatness instead
of acknowledging that God alone is great. "With the utmost severity
and unsparing clarity Therese directs her attack against every
ascetical practice which aims not at God but at one's own 'perfection',
and which is nothing more than spiritual beauty treatment."
"Jesus does not demand great deeds, but only gratitude and self-surrender.
'I will not,' he says, 'take the he-goats from out
of Thy flocks, for all the beasts of the forest are Mine...
Shall I eat the flesh of bullocks, or shall I drink the blood
of goats? 0ffer to God the sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving.' That is all Jesus asks of us! He has no need of our works, but only
of our love."
It is generally
recognized that "cosmetics for the soul" constitute a special
danger for those living the monastic life, and particularly
for contemplatives; but this perilous turning away from God
towards self under the guise of a tender conscience, this measuring
and contemplation of one's own "perfection ", constitutes the
universal "temptation to perfection". This danger of Pharisaism
would not have been depicted in such detail by Our Lord if its
significance had only been restricted to one small caste. The
enemy towards whom Our Lord shows himself so relentless is the
one who remains the enemy for all time.
Whenever
Therese meets this enemy she is as hard and cutting as the Gospel
itself. "One feast day, as a special treat, dessert was served,
but one of the novices was accidently passed over; her neighbor
having failed to notice it, this novice pointed out to her the
'mortification' which she had borne in silence. Therese ordered
her to go immediately to the kitchen Sister
and ask for the portion she had missed. Covered with confusion,
the novice defended herself; but Therese was immovable. 'Let
that be your penance. You are not worthy of the little sacrifices
God asks of you.' " "The same novice tells of how she
once boasted during direction of an 'act of virtue' she had
performed. 'What a pity,' the saint
answered, 'that you behave like that. Considering all the graces and illuminations
which Jesus grants you, you would have been most blameworthy
to have done anything else. What is that in comparison with
what He has a right to expect of you on account of your vows!
Humble yourself, rather, at the thought of the many opportunities
of exercising virtue which you have let slip.'"
It is the
everlasting misunderstanding which was to cling to her throughout
all her years in the cloister, and which she never managed to
destroy; it is ever more firmly fastened upon her the nearer
death approaches. Pauline says to her: "How you must have striven
in order to have reached the degree of perfection at which we
see you now!" Therese's comment is: "Oh,
that's nothing." Or again, later: "Sanctity
does not consist in performing such and such acts; it means
being ready at heart to become small and humble in the
arms of God, acknowledging our own weaknesses and trusting in
His fatherly goodness to the point of audacity." It is
a hopeless struggle, for the more Therese defends herself and
tries to prevent herself from being regarded as a saint, the
more the others wonder at her "humility" and her "perfection".
There is
only a hair's breadth between falsity and the truth, but that
is why God's infinite light is necessary to reveal the difference.
There are two ways in which a Christian can regard "virtue ";
either he can treat it as a quality inherent in himself, a habitus
which he has some justification for attributing to himself
(after all, he sees that he has initiated these "acts of virtue",
rejected temptation, and acquired skill in doing good); or else
he can realize that it depends entirely upon the grace of God
working within him -- and in spite of him!
If he chooses
the first way then he can collect "merit" and store it up, in
which case he can stand back and survey his treasure. If he
chooses the second then the matter is no longer in his hands;
it all remains in the hands of God, his possession. As a child
Therese was trained to "collect" merit; Marie
taught her to do so: "I can still hear you
saying to me, 'Look at the shopkeepers, how much trouble they
give themselves to make money, whereas we can amass treasure
for Heaven without giving ourselves so much trouble; all we
have to do is to gather diamonds with a RAKE'. And off I went,
my heart filled with joy, overflowing with
good resolutions."
And in her
early letters we see the child busy at this work of collecting:
"Every day I try to do all the 'practices'
I can, and I do my best not to let any opportunity pass. From
the bottom of my heart, and as often as possible, I say the little prayers: they are sweet-scented
like roses . . . my thanks to Sister Therese of St. Augustine
for her dear little rosary of practices... " But gradually,
without its being noticed, the meaning of the word changes and
surrenders its kernel of Christian truth the treasure is love,
but love is the prodigality which knows neither to count nor
reckon. "It's very simple. Hold nothing
back; distribute your goods as soon as you get them. As for
myself, if I live to be eighty years old I shall still be as
poor. I do not know how to make economics; everything I have
I give away immediately to buy souls."
And so she
devises a joyous new version of the old fable: "I
have been almost nine years in the house of the Lord.
So I ought by now to be far advanced in the ways of perfection,
but I am still only at the foot of the ladder; it does not discourage
me, and I am as merry as a grasshopper; singing away all day,
and hoping at the end of my life to share in the riches of my
Sisters, who are much more generous than the ant." And
even during her last few days: "I know that my Sisters have told you of my cheerfulness, and it
is true that I am like a finch, except when I have a temperature,
luckily it usually comes only at night, at the hour when finches
sleep, their heads beneath their wings."
Because love
"seeks not its own" she always thinks first of others,
and the more she loves the less it occurs to her to think of
herself. "If I had been rich I could not
have seen a poor person hungry without giving him something
to eat. That is what I do in my spiritual life: as soon as I
acquire something, knowing that there are souls on the point
of falling into Hell, I give them my treasures and I have not
yet had a minute to say, 'Now I am going to work for myself.......
I do not know whether I shall go to Purgatory. Nor am I worried.
If I have to go there, then I shall not regret having done nothing to
avoid it. I am happy to know that our holy Mother Teresa did
not think differently." "If I do
go to Purgatory, then I shall be very content to do so; I shall
do like the three young men, sing the song of love as I am being
transformed in the furnace. How happy I should be if by these
means I could save other souls, and suffer in their place..
" "I would not have picked up a single straw in order to avoid
Purgatory. Everything I have done was in order to give joy to
the good God and to save souls."
Progress does not come through acquisitions
but through losing everything; it does not mean climbing, it
means descending. A novice sighs: "When I think of everything
I still have to acquire!" "You mean, to
lose! Jesus takes it upon Himself to fill your soul, in the
measure that you rid it of its imperfections. I see that you
have taken the wrong road; you will never arrive at the end
of your journey. You are wanting to climb a great mountain,
and the good God is trying to make you descend it; He is waiting
for you at the bottom in the fertile valley of humility."
As we have
seen from her teaching about time and eternity, one does not
achieve sanctity by piling up "acts ": Aloysius could have learnt
no more if he had lived to Noe's age. We have also seen how
Therese as a child was trained to make her particular examen;
and no one had been more eager to finger the pearls of sacrifice
and acts of virtue on the thread of her life. Pauline even gave
her a little notebook in which she might enter her daily progress.
The mature Therese grew out of these habits. "I
know that certain spiritual directors advise us to count our
virtuous acts in order to advance in perfection. But my spiritual
director, Jesus, does not teach me to count my acts. He teaches
me to do it all for love."
If a person
can no longer reckon, then that person approaches God in a condition
of complete poverty, the poverty spoken of by the Gospels, without
which the vision of grace is impossible. "I cannot rely upon anything, not on one single work of mine, for
security... but this poverty is a real grace for me. I thought
of how I could not pay God for even one of the faults I had
committed in the whole of my life, and that precisely this could
be my richness and strength if I wished. And so I prayed, 0
my God, I beg You Yourself to free
me from the guilt I have contracted towards the
souls in Purgatory, but do it as God, so that it will be infinitely
more successful than if I had paid my debts in person. And I
took great comfort in the thought expressed by St. John of the
Cross in his canticle: 'Wipe out all guilt'. I have always related
this to love. I feel that one can never repay this grace...
it is a source of such peace to be utterly poor, to count on
nothing but the love of God."
Because
she attaches such tremendous importance to poverty Therese mistrusts
every form of penance and asceticism which is easily liable
to become an occasion for showing-off. In regard to works of
penance, she says: "One has to be very prudent
in such practices, for they quickly become the work of nature
rather than of virtue. A passage from the life of Bl. Henry
Suso about penitential practices has stuck in my mind. He had
performed the most terrible penitential practices, which had
ruined his health, when an angel appeared and told him to stop
it. And the angel added, 'So far you have fought as a simple
soldier. Now I will dub you a knight'; his meaning was to show
the saint how spiritual combat is superior to corporal mortifications.
Now, little Mother, the good God no longer wishes me to remain
a simple soldier; He has just dubbed me a knight... In this
hidden combat, which lies beyond the reach of nature, I have
found peace and humility."
Admittedly
Therese, like all the saints who have spoken similarly, had
already gone through a great deal of penance. At the start of
her religious life she experienced "a strong inclination to works of penance". "I had taken too much pleasure in them" she confesses, "and
so the good God let me realize that the strictest penances can
be mingled with natural satisfaction." She once tried
wearing a little iron Crucifix with a sharp point upon it on
her breast, but the point pressed into her flesh and caused
a slight inflammation. "I would not have abandoned it for such a trifling reason if the
good God had not wished me to realize that the mortifications
of the saints are not meant for me, nor for the little souls
who will also walk in the way of childhood."
Nor was
it only a question of bodily harm. She tells Pauline that her
previous mortifications at meal-times had been the occasion
of disagreeable thoughts: "Later I found
it simpler to offer whatever pleased my taste to the good God."
"It was well that
Our Lord warned us, 'In My Father's house there are many
mansions, if not I would have told you'. Yes, if every soul
called to perfection were obliged to perform these mortifications
in order to enter Heaven, He would have told us, and we should
have undertaken them with willing hearts. But He explains
to us that 'there are many mansions in His house'. If
some are for great souls, those of the desert Fathers and penitential
martyrs, there must also be some for the little children."
Nevertheless.
Therese's whole life is one long hymn of penance. And not only
in the general sense that to live under vows means having a
penitential status, but in minute application to the details
of penance. Yet the aim of this penance is not to perform great
feats or achieve personal perfection, but to exploit every single
opportunity for gratitude which God offers. Therese never refuses,
but neither does she snatch.
She realizes
that everything in the religious life, down to its least accidentals,
is providential. The rattling of rosary beads in choir nearly
drives her to distraction; but she does not turn round and fix
the guilty Sister with a withering glance. Nor does she try
to shut the noise out of her mind; instead she transforms it
into part of her prayer. At the wash-tub an energetic novice
splashes the dirty water over her face; she does not turn her
face away; and when wash-day comes round again she takes up
the same position. According to her own testimony she suffered
terribly from the cold, especially since her cell was never
heated. One word and she could have had more blankets; but she
remains silent. "One should not betray the
fact that one is cold", she says, "by hunching oneself up or shivering or rubbing one's hands,"
In the refectory it is impossible to work out which dishes she
likes or dislikes. The result is that she is invariably served
with what has been left over; not until her last illness was
she made to say, under obedience, which dishes disagreed with
her.
There is
something Franciscan -- and yet typical of Therese -- in the
story of the flies which plagued her during her last months,
but which she was glad to have there. "They
are my only enemies, and since the good God has urged us to
love our enemies I am glad to have this opportunity. Let them
be." She scolds a novice who was
warming her slippers at the stove: "If I had done that, except under
obedience, I should have accused myself of a great lack of mortification."
It is quite in keeping that she endured the inhuman tortures
of the last weeks without morphia at the request of the Prioress.
Accepting anything, never flinching, and exploiting every opportunity:
with this attitude Therese performs much harder and more persistent
penance then by making sporadic "heroic" acts, where there always
lurks self-glorification.
On the
other hand Therese never comes near to Quietism, which is the
danger when penance is neglected. Her will to penance is an
active one, driving her to accept every opportunity and to note
the least failure. And here she does not cut out the notion
of merits. "So you want to acquire merits?" "Yes,
but not for myself. For souls, and for the needs of the whole
Church... " And she robs the notion of its sting. "Merit
does not arise from performing great deeds or giving much, but
in receiving and loving." She keeps her eye on the intention
and the results, not on the act of self-conquest.
In the
matter of loving her neighbor she is almost excruciatingly sensitive;
yet no one could tell what it cost her to conquer her emotions.
In fact she not only hides her self-conquest from others; she
conceals it from God, and whenever possible, from herself. She
lays the emphasis entirely on the love which has to be achieved,
not on the achievement itself -- even, going one step further,
on the objective sacrifice, in which she herself remains as
if anonymous. She fulfils the command not to let the left hand
know what the right is doing, even when left and right signify
part of the same soul. This is the point at which God intervenes
to ensure that her achievement should be unconscious, and he
does so by allowing all feeling to be withdrawn. Her achievement
remains, and is infinitely greater, but separate from her, as
if it had gone dead in her hands. "Ah! that
is indeed a great love, to love Jesus without feeling the sweetness
of that love, there you have martyrdom . . . All right! let
us die maryrs! Oh! my Celine... sweet echo of my soul, do
you understand?... Martyrdom unrealized by men, known to God
alone, undiscoverable by the eye of any creature, martyrdom
without honor, without triumph..."
But even
in this martyrdom the point is not the record of suffering but
the intensity of love. Every penance which increases
true love is good; any penance which narrows and
preoccupies the soul is harmful. "Certainly
every penance is laudable and meritorious if one is convinced
that the good God requires it of one. Even if one errs in doing
it He is touched by the intention. But I could never bind myself
to anything if it became a constant preoccupation . . . as our
Mother St. Teresa says: God is not concerned with a heap of
trifles, as we too easily believe; and we should never let anything,
narrow our souls." "Love is the one
thing at which we should aim, consequently we should always
prefer that deed into which we can crush most love, whether
it is 'harder' or 'easier'; it is better to do something which
is in itself indifferent than something 'worthwhile' in itself
if we can do the first more lovingly than the second. "
She is very fond of fingering fruit, such as the peach, and
admiring its velvety skin, or distinguishing the scents of individual
flowers. For her it would have been an offence against simplicity
not to derive enjoyment when it was an occasion of love and
thankfulness towards God for the beauty of nature and music.
"Out of love I will suffer and out of love
rejoice."
Not penance,
but the reckoning of it, is demolished with her. By eliminating
all human reckoning Therese makes room for grace. In the religion
of the Old Law one deed was set against another, God's deeds
and human deeds. And on account of human weakness it was almost
inevitable that this religion should terminate in Pharisaism.
The grace of the New Law eliminates every reckoning. It is not
only that God takes the initiative by the totally unmerited
gift of grace, but that subsequently the relations between God
and the soul are not governed by any law of reckoning within
human grasp. As far as Therese is concerned the real purpose
in demolishing the whole ethic of works is to allow the shining
miracle of divine grace to light up the life of every Christian.
Here the
best known of all Therese's metaphors and images begin to crowd
in; they are images of the incomprehensibility of divine grace.
If men ought not to reckon, that is because God does not reckon,
indeed cannot reckon because it would be contrary to his innermost
essence, which is overflowing love. "There
is one science which He does not know -- arithmetic."
(Even at school Therese had shown a distaste for arithmetic.)
Whereas the very quickest calculation proceeds on the assumption of a continuous gradation
of numbers, grace is in no way limited to such gradations.
The image
which occurs to Therese to express this vision is that of a
lift. "Alas, I have always noticed, in comparing
myself with the great saints, the same difference between them
and myself as we see in nature between a mountain whose summit
is lost in the clouds and an obscure little grain of sand trampled
underfoot by passersby... it is impossible for me to grow great...
But we live in an age of inventions: nowadays there is no need
to go to the trouble of climbing a stairway step by step; this
is now done amongst rich people by means of a lift. I also wished
to discover a lift to take me up to Jesus; because I
am too little to climb the steep stairway of perfection."
In this enchanting picture the lift is nothing else but the
love that desroys all distances and eliminates all calculable
continuity.
She writes
to Abbe Belliere: "More than ever I realized the degree to which your love is sister
to mine, since it is called to go up to God by the lift of love,
not to climb the rough stairway of fear." And
if the picture simply seems to replace the slow methodical climb
by a sudden jerk, which remains equally bound to the imagery
of ascending, it can be supplemented by a picture of grace descending
in power. She pictures a mother standing at the stair-head,
who sees her child vainly trying to mount the stairs; the mother
comes down to lift the child up into her arms. She pictures
the divine eagle swooping down to the little bird helplessly
fluttering on the ground, and then soaring with it on its pinions
into the abyss of light. The pattern is always the same: the
human beginning, faltering, scarcely perceptible, and then the
completion of the work by a lightning-flash of divine intervention.
When the Father Superior visits her to encourage her he exclaims:
"What? You wish to go to Heaven soon? But your crown is not
yet perfect. You have scarcely begun! " Therese replies: "Oh, Father, how right you are! I have not made my crown, but the
good God has made it."
At this
point grace seems to be something magical; more precisely, it
is something creative. God calls that which is not into existence.
Powers are bestowed upon the creature which are far beyond its
own reach, beyond its dreams even. Vistas are opened
up which it could never attain of itself, and aims that it could never
have set itself. Yet nature is not eliminated by the magic of
grace. Nature is there, not even neglected or concealed, but
multiplied, intensified, and broken into a richer existence.
Therese
tells us of a kaleidoscope which she possessed in her childhood.
"A sort of little telescope at the far end
of which one could see pretty patterns of different colors;
if one turns the instrument it produces infinite variations
on these patterns." She takes the magical tube to pieces
to see how the miracle happens; she discovers "some
little bits of paper and cloth scattered inside, and three mirrors
on the inside of the tube". And this becomes an image
for her of a great mystery. "So long as
our actions, no matter how trivial, remain within the focus
of love, the Blessed Trinity . . . gives them a wonderful brilliance
and beauty. When Jesus looks at us through the little lens,
which is to say Himself, He finds all our doings beautiful.
But if we abandon the ineffable center of love, what does He
see? A few straws . . . besmirched and worthless deeds."
Rarely
has anyone hit upon such a striking and theologically exact
image of grace, provided that God's vision through the lens
is taken as the true and creative vision, and the natural materials
as no more than the presupposition on which the truth works.
The magic of grace is not something subjective, a form of mystification.
In fact, the vision of the three-personed God, the loving vision,
is the one objective, truth-revealing vision. Terese realizes
this, and that is why she begs the three-personed God "to
look at me only with the Face of Jesus between, and in His Heart burning with Love". For
God sees us as we really are, in our eternal reality and not
in time's deceptive mirror.
To the
same end she invokes "imagination" (i.e. hypnotism) as an illustration: "Oh, how I should like to be hypnotized by Our Lord!... with what
meekness I have surrendered my will to Him! Yes, I want Him
to take over all my faculties so that I no longer perform human
and personal actions but utterly divine ones, inspired and directed
by the spirit of love! " In this instance a spiritual
nature is treated as the stuff which has to be taken over, controlled
and re-formed -- though the image is obviously incomplete since
hypnotism eliminates the subject's personal freedom whereas
grace preserves and intensifies it.
The point
is that man cannot be hypnotized by grace apart from his own
will and self-surrender, but that once he is in the power of
this higher will then he carries it out without knowing its
laws and purposes. One final picture, in which she expresses
our inability to penetrate into God's schemes: "At
this moment Your Therese does not find herself on the heights,
but Jesus is teaching her... He is teaching her to play at love's
bank, or rather, He plays for her, not telling he just how He
goes about it for that is His business and not Therese's; her
part is to abandon herself, to give herself over, keeping nothing
for herself, not even the joy of knowing how His bank is paying."
She depicts
the "magic" of grace so perfectly that it appears to act without
laws. Winnings come out of it which no one, with all the science
in the world, could have predicted. There is only one condition
for winning: to stake all, and in the same act stake all one's
winnings as well as the knowledge of them. Just as the lover
does not belong to himself, so also his winnings are not his
to keep. God will use them as he wishes, sharing them, or keeping
them or investing them where he thinks best. The lover's stake
in God's play is himself; he throws himself into it for God's
sake. He does not care to know whether he will be multiplied
a hundredfold, sixtyfold, or thirtyfold, for the sum of his
winnings no more belongs to him than the ear of wheat belongs
to the seed that died. The original sum no longer exists; it
has vanished into the sum of the winnings. Therefore love, in
a sense, is magic: it produces what was not there and spirits
away what was there. "The principal plenary
indulgence, and one which everyone may obtain without the customary
conditions, is the indulgence of charity
which covers a multitude
of sins."
By eliminating
all reckoning she at the same time demolishes the structure
of "merit" or "reward" in the human sense. Reckonings and rewards
are both Old Testament metaphors for New Testament realities.
But we may also plunge directly into the interior law of love,
and then we discover the limits of the Old Testament concepts,
which are all based upon one-to-one reckoning. But not only
is there no comparison between the sufferings of the present
time and the glory of eternity (Rom. 8: 18); even the blessed enjoying eternal happiness will see it -- lovers
that they are -- as pure unmerited grace, not a reward for services
rendered.
Perhaps
they will appreciate God's joy in rewarding good service; they
may even discern some proportion between the rewards and merits
of others; in their own case these notions simply do not apply.
And so heaven is a "stolen heaven ":
"My protectors in Heaven, my favorites, are those who stole it,
such as the Holy Innocents and the Good Thief. The great saints
have won it by their works: for myself, I wish to imitate the
thieves, to take it by a trick, a trick of love which will give
me entry, me and other poor sinners. I am encouraged to do so
by the Holy Spirit, who says in Proverbs, 'Come to me, little
one, to learn subtlety'."
In one's
dealings with God one should never allow grace to be twisted
into a matter of obligation, for that is to treat a child as
an adult, subject to reward and punishment. "To be little means recognizing one's nothingness, expecting everything
from the good God, as a little child expects everything from
its Father... Even amongst the poor a little child is given
everything it needs so long as it is little; but as soon as
it grows up its father will no longer feed it and says, 'Work
now, you can look after yourself'. Well now, it is because I
did not want to hear those words that I have not wanted to grow
up, because I feel incapable of earning my living, the eternal
living of Heaven."
There was
nothing Therese feared more than to find herself settling debts
with God. And since it is only grown-ups who settle debts she
intends at all costs to preserve that relationship which one
finds amongst children when they are dealing with each other.
She simply will not grow old, and so will not be obliged to
earn heaven. She wants no reward: "At Sext
a verse occurs in the Divine Office which I recite each day
with reluctance; it is this: 'I have inclined my heart to do Thy justifications for ever,
because of the reward'. I hasten
to add in my heart, 'O my Jesus, You know well that I do not
serve You for reward, but solely because I love You and in order
to save souls'."
Therefore
at the end of her life she desires to appear empty-handed before
God, and rejoices at the thought. When Pauline says, "Oh, when
I die I shall have nothing to show to the good God, I shall
arrive empty-handed, and that makes me very sad", Therese answers:
"You are not like me, then, though we are both in the same position.
Even if I had performed all the deeds of St. Paul I would still
consider myself an unprofitable servant; I would notice that
my hands were empty. But that is precisely the cause of my joy;
since I have nothing, I shall expect everything from the good
God."
It is easily
seen that Therese does not sit in judgment on anyone's works
or labors, but the one thing she cannot abide is that human
beings should boast of their works in the face of God. To do
so would be to insult grace, since "Jesus
wants to grant us the same graces, wants to give us His Heaven
as a free gift". The
fact that there is no relation between earthly labor and heavenly
reward was already her greatest incentive for throwing all her
energies into the love and service of God when she was no more
than fourteen: "I already had a presentiment
of what God has prepared for those who love Him; and realizing
the lack of proportion between these eternal rewards and the
petty sacrifices of this life, I desired to love, to love Jesus
passionately, to offer Him countless tokens of my affection
whilst I could still do so."
This lack
of proportion cannot be identified with the empty dialectic
between sin and grace characteristic of Protestantism; it is
the Catholic truth that the relation between grace received
and grace to be received is infinitely increasing. It is this
which touches Therese so deeply in Our Lord's words to St. Mechtild:
"I am telling you the truth, that it gives me great joy when
men expect mighty things of me. However great their faith and
boldness may be, I shall bestow on them far more than their
merits." And so Therese entrusts herself to this "far-more "
promised by God's grace. "I know well that
I shall never be worthy of what I am hoping for; but I put my
hand out like a begging child, and I know that You will grant
me so much more than I ask, because You are so good."
And we
are now shown the reverse side of Therese the thief of heaven.
Previously it was Therese who stole heaven; now it is God, the
great eagle, who steals her and carries his booty off to heaven.
"I see Him from afar and take care not to
shout, 'There goes the thief!' On the contrary. I call
to Him, 'This way! This way!"' "In the Gospels
we are told that God will come like a thief. Soon
He will come to steal me. And how gladly I shall help the Thief."
We have
been led unawares into the very heart
of Therese's mission. What Therese goes on to say, as she acknowledges,
is the secret source of her doctrinal message. By demolishing
the religion of works for the sake of pure love (which in itself
is more effective than all justification by works) she places
herself at the very center of the Gospel, at the very point
where the joyous message of redemption marks the decisive step
from the Old Testament to the New.
The mentality
which confronts Therese so frequently in the Catholic asceticism
of her day, and which she feels more and more obliged to reject,
is the Old Testament mentality of justification by works expressed
in its most extreme form in Pharisaism. Since this attitude
assumes that man's relations with God are based entirely upon
justice, and this limited conception of justice is the limit
of these relations, it can imagine only one ideal -- to step
up one's own achievements so as to produce a corresponding increase
in God's favors.
But this
ideal overlooks what Paul showed to be the very basis and raison
d'etre of God's testament with the chosen people: Abraham's
faith, which implicitly includes hope and love as well. The
people forgot that the law and its works are prophetic in character,
pointing towards the Messiah; they are meant to express faith
in the promised Christ who would fulfill the law and its works.
The people attributed a significance to the law in itself which
obscured and sometimes even destroyed its true significance.
Yet how easy it was under the Old Law to fall into a religion
of justification by works! God first revealed himself as the
God of justice, not as the God of love. And besides wishing
to prepare humanity for love by means of the law God also wished
the failure of the law and its works to demonstrate what happens
when men rely upon their own achievements apart from the Cross
of Christ. "Now the law entered in, that sin might abound"
(Rom. 5: 2o).
Therese
inserts her New Testament theology and asceticism at the exact
point where the transition takes place. Her "little
way" to "little sanctity"
at first appears quite innocently as one way amongst many others, and she contrasts it particularly with the "great ways" of the "great saints"
(to start with these include her big sisters Pauline and Marie,
both of whom she describes as "eagles"
in comparison with herself, the "little
bird "). These great saints have done mighty deeds for
God, but they are so superior as to discourage Therese, who
does not dare to set out on their highway.
But the
more she gets to know the little way the more she realizes,
to her genuine surprise, that it is the only way. So we need
not ourselves be impressed when we notice an ironical, scolding
twinkle in her eye as she gazes reverently towards the "great saints". The twinkle becomes more obvious as time
goes on and she assumes the role of David, armed with a sling,
and venturing into the open to attack the Goliath of "great
sanctity." "The great saints have
gained Heaven by their works; myself, I wish to imitate the
thieves, I wish to take it by a trick, a trick of love which
will give me entry, me and other poor sinners."
And what
is this trick? "It is quite simple. Hold nothing back. Distribute your goods as
soon as you get them ... if at the moment of death I were to
present my little coins to have them estimated at their true
worth Our Lord would not fail to discover dross in them which
I should certainly go and deposit in Purgatory. Are we not told
that although the great saints appear before God's judgment
seat with their hands full of merits, yet they sometimes go
to that place of expiation because no justice is without blemish
in the eyes of the Lord." And now she transfers her amused
gaze away from men towards God, as it were teasing the God of
justice: "When I think of the good God's
statement: 'I shall come soon and bring my reward with me,
repaying everyone according to his works', then I say to
myself that He will find Himself wonderfully embarrassed with
me, because I have no works! So He will not be able to repay
me according to my works. Very well, then, I trust that He will
repay me according to His works."
Therese
here is preaching a lesson straight from the gospel of Paul:
"Now to him that worketh, the reward is not reckoned according
to grace, but according to debt. But to him that worketh not,
yet believeth in him that justifieth the ungodly,
his faith is reputed to justice, according to the purpose of the grace
of God" (Rom. 4: 4-5). Therese is well aware other kinship
with Paul, since she heads her "Song of the Innocent Children"
with this very text, joined to Romans 3: 24 -- "Being justified
freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ
Jesus" -- for the reward will not be reckoned as grace
for those who perform works, but as a debt. Therefore those
who do not perform works will be justified freely through grace
by the redemption worked by Jesus Christ"
Just as
fundamentally Pauline is the thought that those stripped of
justice (which means everyone) will by God's grace be clothed
in his justice. Therese follows her master exactly: "In the evening of this life I shall appear before You empty-handed,
for I do not ask You, Lord, to count my works. All our justices
have stains in Your sight. So I want to be clad in Your own
Justice, and receive from Your Love the possession of
Yourself. I want no other Throne or other Crown
than You, 0 my Beloved."
Therese
does not reject works out of hand; there is nothing even remotely
Protestant about her interpretation of St. Paul. But she knows
that everything good and virtuous in man is grace, the gift
of God's justice. "To be little means not
attributing the virtues we practice to ourselves in the belief
that we are capable of them; but recognizing that the good God
places this treasure in the hands of His little child for him
to use when necessary; but the treasure remains God's always."
Once more
the need to remain a child is clear. The child cannot do as
he pleases with the treasure entrusted to him; he can only hold
it in his hand. A grown-up, however, is faced with the temptation
to use the treasure on his own initiative. His maturity obviously
throws a responsibility upon his shoulders which the child does
not have to bear. And so Therese is impelled along her little
way into another of Paul's secrets: "Therese is weak, very weak;
every day she experiences it afresh, but Jesus delights to teach
her as He taught St. Paul, the science of glorying in one's
infirmities... Seeing yourself so worthless you wish no longer
to look at yourself, you look only at the sole Beloved Therese
stands therefore in the true Augustinian tradition of
"non parum, sed nihil"; "Maybe,
if Peter had caught a few small fish, Jesus would not
have worked a miracle, but he had nothing, so Jesus soon
filled his net, so that it almost broke."
From all
this it is clear that for Therese the idea of a perfection resulting
from one's own efforts was an Old Testament concept; that is
where she relegates the "great achievements"
of the "great saints" whenever they
are really the results of personal effort rather than of God's
grace. She herself allots the "great"
asceticism of perfection to the Old Testament and the "little"
asceticism of love to the New: "I am but
a weak and helpless child; yet it is my very weakness that makes
me dare to offer myself as a victim of Your love, 0 Jesus! In
earlier times only pure and spotless holocausts were acceptable
to the strong and mighty God: perfect victims were needed to
satisfy divine justice; but the law of love has replaced the
law of fear, and love has chosen me for a holocaust, weak and
imperfect creature as I am! Is this choice not worthy of love?"
The change
in the holocaust is not carried out in an arbitrary fashion
but in response to a change in God's demands. Previously God
himself demanded complete justice; now he asks for love. God
himself has transformed the justice of the Old Testament into
the mercy of the New. Whereas in the Old Testament justice ranks
first amongst God's attributes, in a way restricting and limiting
love and mercy, in the New Testament it is so outshone by love
that justice ranks as one quality of God's love. Love is the
revelation of God's innermost being: "God is love" (I
John 4: 8) we are told -- never "God is justice". Consequently
justice can only be eternal and infinite in so far as it is
one with the boundless love of God; if it ever seems to impose
limits on love (as in the economy of the Old Law), then it can
only be a temporal and finite revelation of God's being.
By demolishing
the limits which the old conception of justice imposes on love
Therese reaches the peak of her theological audacity. She refuses
to acknowledge that there is the same tension in God between
justice and love as there is between the Old and New Testament,
or between fear and love. She refuses to relegate God's justice
to the Old Testament and, therefore, to the law of fear. "Fear
brings us only to Justice... to strict Justice as it
is shown to sinners, but that is not the Justice Jesus
will have for those who love Him." She insists that we
should take the Pauline gospel of the Dikaiosyne Theou seriously;
it is a gift of God's grace, and has to be treasured as an essential
part of the New Testament.
At the
end of the first draft of her manuscript she lets us in to the
inner chamber of her theology:
"It
seems to me that if all creatures received the same favors God
would be feared by no one, and loved even unto folly; no longer
would any soul commit the least voluntary fault, refraining
out of love, and not out of fear. At the same time I realize
that all souls cannot be alike; there must be different families
of them, so that each may specially honor some divine perfection.
To me He has allotted His INFINITE MERCY and this is the incomparable
mirror in which I contemplate the other attributes. There they
all appear to be radiant with love -- justice, in fact,
perhaps more than any other, seems to be bathed in love. What
a sweet joy it is to think that the Lord is just, which means
that He takes our weaknesses into account and is perfectly aware
of the frailty of our nature! What, then, need I fear? The good
God who is infinitely just and deigns in His great mercy to
pardon the faults of the prodigal son, must He not be just
to me also, who am always with Him? "
Thus Therese
sees it as her special mission to view all God's attributes
in the light of his merciful love; his love is not simply connected
with the other attributes, it embraces them. Even his justice
is manifested and comprehensible through love. And Therese attaches
the greatest importance to having her teaching on this point
properly understood. Not many months before her death, on the
16th July 1897, she says to Pauline: "In
my manuscript I have only said a word or two on the good God's
justice. But if you wish you can discover my whole mind on this
matter in a letter to Father Roulland, where I have explained
it at length." This letter, however, though very valuable,
does not really take us beyond the point in the History of
a Soul which I have quoted above: Therese writes to her
missionary-brother P. Roulland as follows: "I
know one must be most pure to appear before the God of all holiness,
but I know too that the Lord is infinitely just; and it is this
justice, which terrifies so many souls,
that is the basis of my joy and trust. To be just means not only
to exercise severity in punishing the guilty, but also to recognize
right intentions and to reward virtue. I hope as much from the
good God's justice as from His mercy -- because He is 'compassionate
and merciful, long-suffering and plenteous in mercy'."
Once again
she rejects the parallel between fear and hope on one side and
justice and mercy on the other. The New Testament hope is equally
directed towards each of these attributes. The novelty in this
text is that here Therese is pointing towards God's justicc
as the source of his mercy, whereas in the other text she describes
justice more as a quality immanent in God's love. However one
may interpret the mutual inherence of justice and mercy one
thing is certain: the regards of virtue on which she sets her
heart in this letter should not be
seen, in the Old Testament sense, as repayment for good deeds.
This would mean that Therese was now questioning everything
she had said earlier, and casting doubt on the whole of her
mission. What she is saying, in fact, is that in the New Testament
God distributes rewards in virtue of his grace; the reward is
one factor within his uncovenanted mercy. God is so merciful
that he even rewards virtue.
Therese
has now arrived at the classical formula of Catholic teaching
on merit: St. Thomas Aquinas on the one hand bases the correspondence
between merit and reward upon the free disposition of divine
love, and on the other hand takes supernatural love in man as
the principle of all merit (S. Th. I-11, q. I I4, a- 4, C).
Therese
takes one final step further when she quotes Psalm 35: 5 as
her justification for confining God's primitive justice to the
temporal, finite economy of salvation whereas she regards the
realm of merciful love (in which God's justice is immanent)
as eternal and ultimate. "If Your justice
desires to work itself out, even though this world is its only
field, how much more Your merciful love desires to inflame souls,
since 'Thy mercy reaches even to the Heavens'."
Consequently
Therese does not offer herself as a victim of divine mercy.
She has struggled out beyond the limits of fear to the place
from which she can say, with St. John "He that abideth in
charity abideth in God, and God in him. In this is the charity
of God perfected with us, that we may have
confidence in the day of judgment; because as he is, we also
are in this world. Fear is not in charity: but perfect charity
casteth out fear, because fear hath pain. And he that feareth
is not perfected in charity " (I John 4: 16-18). From now
on, true to the spirit of St. John, Therese is beyond fear,
making room within herself for the fullness of love to dwell.
From now on she places her life beneath the law of complete
love and considers that the fire of love is more effective in
purifying her than the fear of purgatory.
Once the
complete surrender to merciful love has been made, "...love
surrounds and penetrates me; at every moment this merciful
love renews and purifies me, leaving no trace of sin in
my heart. No, I cannot fear Purgatory: I know that I should not deserve
to enter that place of expiation along with the holy souls;
but I also know that the fire of love is more sanctifying than
that of Purgatory. I know that Jesus cannot desire useless suffering
for us, and that He would not inspire me with the desires I
feel if He did not wish to fulfill them..." "How can He possibly
let Himself be outdone in generosity? How can He purify in the
flames of Purgatory souls consumed in the fires of divine love?"
Whoever
places himself beneath the law of divine love for good and all
is in truth beyond judgment and no longer needs to fear it.
One novice was "extraordinarily frightened of God's judgment;
and in spite of everything she [i.e. Therese] said to me nothing
could drive away my fear ". Therese shows her the only way to
escape the judgment, which is "to appear before God empty-handed", and so deprive him of
any matter for judgment. We should not hold on to any good that
we do, but pass it on immediately." 'But', I broke in, 'if God
does not judge our good actions He will judge our bad ones,
and then?' 'What is that you are saying?
Our Lord is justice itself. If He does not judge our good deeds,
neither will He judge our bad ones. It seems to me that there
will be no judgment for the victims of love; rather the good
God will hasten to bestow eternal bliss upon them, rewarding
His own love which He sees burning in their hearts'."
Once more
it is not merely in virtue of his mercy, restraining his justice,
that God does not pronounce judgment, but in virtue of his very
justice, in so far as it is one with his love. Within love,
divine justice discerns a certain correspondence
and proportion between love as it is in God and love as it is
in the believer who has accepted and preserved the love of God,
through grace. The property of perceiving this proportion is
the justice of God's love and automatically dispenses eternal
rewards.
Consequently
the person in whom grace dwells must order all his thoughts
according to the law of love, and must abandon all judgments:
"Yes, it is the Lord, it is Jesus who judges
me! And in order to secure a favorable judgment, or rather so
as not to be judged at all, I wish my thoughts to be charitable
always, since He says, 'Judge not, and ye shall not be judged'."
And with the judgment almost in sight: "If
you only knew how mild my judgment will be! For even if the
good God scolds me a little, I shall still find it mild. 'For
to him that is little, mercy is granted' (Wisd 6:
7). And it is possible to stay little even when one is entrusted
with responsible positions and lives a long life...It is written
that 'in the end the Lord will rise up to save the lowly
and meek of the earth'. It does not say, to judge, but to
save."
This whole
process of demolishing the "great way",
the way of justification by works, has shown the little way
of love to be the only way. It is the way of grace, and of the
New Dispensation, but it is not on that account the easier way.
Although Therese depicts the great way as involving extraordinary
penances and heroic deeds -- the vocation of the few -- and
contrasts it with the little way, along which all little souls
have to follow her, she herself knew from hard experience how
much determination it requires. Isolated acts are not enough;
it demands one's whole being. What matters is not the act but
the condition of the soul from which it proceeds. It stands
in the same relation to the other way as does the knight to
the soldier in Suso's vision. Nor does Therese hesitate to describe
the "way of weakness" as the more
meritorious: "What merit would you earn
if you had to feel full of courage before you would fight? What
does it matter if you feel like it or not so long as you behave
as if you did? If you find yourself too tired to pick up a bit
of thread, but do so nevertheless for the love of Jesus, you
gain more merit than if you were to perform a much more remarkable
deed in a moment of fervor."
It requires
more spiritual courage to make light of one's sufferings, or
to say nothing about them, than to attract other people's admiration
and pity. On one occasion when a novice deemed herself to have
performed an "heroic act of virtue" Therese, not without a certain
sarcasm, relegates her to the ranks of the beginners: "What
is that little act of virtue in comparison with what the Lord
might legitimately demand of you? You ought rather to feel humble
at having neglected so many opportunities of proving your love."
Celine regrets that the enthusiasm she felt on first
entering the convent has evaporated. "That
was simply youthfulness. Real courage does not consist of that
momentary flush in which one longs to go out and capture souls
in the face of every danger, which only lends a delicious attraction
to this beautiful dream. To be really brave means asking for
the Cross when one's heart is full of fear, and withstanding
this fear like Our Lord in the Garden of Olives."
This is
the most difficult of all, to go on suffering when one is weak,
and it is precisely because she can manage it that Therese seems
hard, almost Nietzschean. A Sister had remarked: "I do not like
to see people suffering, especially holy people." Therese took
her up straight away: "Oh! I am not a bit
like you! Holy people suffering never rouse my pity. I know
that they have the strength to bear their sufferings, and that
it enables them to give God great glory; but those who are not
holy, who do not know how to profit from their sufferings, oh,
how sorry I am for them! How much pity I feel for them! I
would move Heaven and earth to console and relieve them!"
She sugars
the bitter pill with humor sometimes, as in the anecdote from
her childhood, when a horse was blocking the garden-gate and
the grown-ups did not know how to get past; in a twinkling Therese
scrambled through between its legs. "Why
do you always try to fly above temptations? just pass underneath.
It is all very well for the great saints to fly over the
clouds when the storm is raging; we simply have to put up with
the showers. So much the worse if we get a little damp! We can
dry ourselves afterwards in the sun of love."
There is
something military about the way she makes light of difficulties
and suppresses her complaints. Serving with the colors we take
many troubles in our stride which would have made
us grumble for hours in civilian life! That is the ethos of
the little way. There is much sound, Gallic irony in Therese
of Lisieux's make-up. Typical of her attitude is the image in
which she manages to combine motifs from the first Psalm and
St. Paul, Pascal's famous "roseau pensant " and La Fontaine's
fable of the oak and the reed. "What does
it matter to the little reed if it bends? It is in no
fear of breaking, for it has been planted on the edge of the
waters. Instead of touching the earth when it bends, it meets
only a pleasant wave which gives it new strength and makes it
long for another storm to break over its frail head. It is its
weakness that gives it all its confidence. It could not possibly
break since , whatever happens to it, it sees only the gentle
hand of Jesus."
To demolish
the ethic of good works produces the very opposite of Quietism.
In fact, it empties the soul of all its own perfections, which
are always "full of blemish before God", in order to free it
for the service of Christ which far exceeds its own strength:
to be perfect as the Father in heaven is perfect. Therese well
knows what this command with its tremendous promise demands
of her. "Celine, do you think that St. Teresa
received more graces than you?... for my part I do not tell
you to aim at seraphic sanctity, but simply 'to be
perfect as your heavenly Father is perfect'... Ah! Celine,
our infinite desires are after all not dreams or fantasies,
since Jesus Himself gave us this commandment."
By-passing
the fruitless discussions as to whether the Sermon on the Mount
is "practicable " -- a discussion only indulged in by the faint-hearted
and the theorists -- Therese simply takes Our Lord's statement
as a command. And she sets about putting it into practice at
the very point which Christ indicates -- "Be you therefore
perfect as also your heavenly Father is perfect . . . who maketh
his sun to rise upon the good and the bad, and raineth upon
the just and the unjust. For if you love them that love you,
what reward shall you have? Do not even the publicans this?
And if you salute your brethren only, what do you more? Do not
also the heathen this? " (Matt. 5: 48, 45-7). Therese strives
to make love of her neighbor and her enemy an all-embracing
law reaching to the smallest details of life. By doing so she
allows the will of the heavenly Father,
as manifest in the Son, to do its work in her.
"Judge
not, then you yourselves will not be judged." "To
try to convince our Sisters that they are in the wrong is not
fair play even if it is true -- because we are not responsible
for their conduct. We must not be judges of peace but
only angels of peace."
In her chapters on loving our neighbor (i.e. chs. ix. and
x.) Therese herself took good care to illustrate her every theoretical
observation with some practical anecdote. And the more one studies
the picture which emerges the more its supernatural pattern
stands out.
Therese's
masterpiece is not the result of strenuous human application
-- f it were nothing but that it would belong to the Old Law
which Therese had rejected. It is so light and transparent,
so sunny and smiling, so seemingly ordinary, that it can be
regarded as the clearest sign of the grace welling up within
her. It is a miracle of divine grace for which Therese had prepared
the way, clearing aside every obstacle to God's perfect love.
Humanly speaking, the whole drama seems to be one great "as
if", a straining and perversion of human nature. One must behave
like everyone else, not leaving the ranks either for weal or
for woe, not pushing oneself forward or becoming the center
of attention; one must behave as if there were nothing lacking...
No! One should not behave as if one were of no importance;
one must know that it is, in fact, true, and that what ever
one does, thinks or feels is really not worth talking about
or calling attention to.
One of
her Sisters later testified that Therese was certainly good
and conscientious, but nothing outstanding. She had nothing
to suffer, and was rather insignificant... virtuous, certainly
-- but that is no tremendous feat when one is blessed with a
happy disposition and has no need to struggle through suffering
to virtue, as "we others" have to... Another Sister, during
recreation, remarks: "I cannot understand why people speak of
Sister Therese of the Child Jesus as if she were a saint. She
never does anything notable. One never sees her practicing virtue,
and so one cannot even maintain that she is a good nun." Or
according to another version: "She did indeed practice virtue,
but her virtue was not acquired through humiliations and suffering."
Therese
is as light as a feather -- "By the grace
of God I try
hard not to burden others with the trials which God deems good
for me." She had demolished herself so completely that
she personally weighs nothing; her only weight is the weight
of love.
CONSTRUCTION
In its negative
aspect the little way means demolishing the structure of "great
deeds ". If this were its only result it might just as well
be described as the way of mediocrity or fecklessness. But in
fact it is the way of New Testament love, a way therefore which
leads "unto the end" (John 13: 1). Yet Therese does insist
that it is a quite ordinary way and is for everyone: "In
my little way there are only very ordinary things; it is essential that little souls should be able to do everthing I do."
Therese
had emptied her soul of all her own perfections and deeds to
create room for the love of God within her. She did not even
clear aside the "moral virtues " so as to leave more room for
the "infused virtues". She does not make room for virtue, but
for God: all that matters now is that God wishes to be loved
and must be loved. Not until her last years does the whole depth
of this mystery open up before her.
She explains
this herself in the concluding pages of her original manuscript:
"During the year 1895 I received the grace
of understanding better than ever how much Jesus desires to
be loved." In her earlier writings, her poems and letters,
we find scarcely a trace of this insight. Until now her vision
had stretched no further than the need to love God. Her love
was an urge and a longing to surrender herself utterly. Now
she sees further: God wishes to be loved. God urgently needs
the creature to demonstrate his love and pour upon him the free
stream of his love. God wishes to redeem; he wishes to show
mercy. But he can only do so when his love is free to overflow
into the world, into the hearts of men. But that is just what is prevented everywhere;
everywhere his love is misunderstood and rejected. "...The hearts on whom You wish to lavish it turn towards creatures, seeking happiness
from them in the miserable satisfaction of the moment instead
of throwing themselves into Your arms and embracing the blissful
furnace of Your
infinite love... 0 my God, must Your despised love remain
shut in Your heart for ever? It seems
to me that if You were to find souls offering themselves as
SACRIFICIAL VICTIMS OF YOUR LOVE, You would consume them rapidly
and be glad not to restrain the flames of tenderness shut up
within You."
In the
same year Therese composes two little mystery-plays dealing
with the same thought. In "The Divine Child begging at Christmas
", the Christ Child is depicted as subject to all human needs,
all of which are equally love's needs, and may be satisfied
by love in its different forms. This same thought constantly
recurs as the leitmotif of "Jesus in Bethany " : "Yes,
it is your heart that I desire," says Jesus,
"I came down to it from Heaven, leaving
infinite glory for the sake of it. You have understood the mystery
which brought Me down to earth: the interior soul is much more
precious to Me, much more precious than the Glory of Heaven."
God is the beggar of love. It means that love of man is transformed
into the pure service of God's love, and this service
extinguishes the last remnants of self-seeking in human love,
in Christian love even. Faith, hope and charity become what
Christ wills them to be: a living re-presentation of the Father,
which means the pure service of the Father's will.
The "little
way" that Therese now constructs comes from renouncing
everything in Christian love which seems to lend it greatness,
power and glory. Love is brought to a state of weakness in which
it learns the power of divine love, of littleness and darkness
in which the greatness and glory of divine love are displayed.
The basis of the little way, therefore, is one series of renunciations
after another.
The first
renunciation is of the pleasure and joy that accompany love.
At a very early date we find her writing: "I
need to forget the earth; here below everything wearies me,
everything is an effort, I find only one joy, to suffer for
Jesus... But this unfelt joy is above every joy... I
hit upon the secret of suffering in peace. The word peace does
not mean joy, at least not fel joy; to suffer in peace it is
enough to will whatever Jesus wills." Unfelt joy; peace,
not joy; a first formula in which to express the mysterious
transcendence of Christian love. For that is the purpose
of it all: to transfer the impulse towards acts
of faith, hope and charity, away from the subject into God himself.
One year
later: "If you knew how great is my joy at having no joy, to give pleasure
to Jesus! . . . It is the essence of joy (but wholly unfelt)."
Once more we perceive the subtlety of her psychological
reflections, the joy of unfelt joy; but the purpose is
plain enough: "To give pleasure to Jesus." In this way faith itself is
drawn out of its own center: " If you are
willing to bear serenely the trial of being displeasing to yourself,
you will be to Jesus a pleasant place of shelter; you will suffer,
of course, for you will be outside the door of your own home;
but have no fear, the poorer you are the more Jesus will love
you."
And since
faith seizes upon the whole of a person, the whole person is
drawn out from himself into the transcendence of the act of
faith. Certainly he still commits acts and feels their stress,
but now they are centered outside his own experience. For instance
he suffers, and is at the same time beyond suffering. "He
is not here, for he is risen.... Come, and see the place where
the Lord was laid": commenting on this text, Therese says:
"That is, I am no longer susceptible, as
I was in my childhood, to every sorrow. I am, so to speak, risen.
I am no longer in the place people believe. Mother, do not worry
about me; I cannot suffer any more, because all suffering has
become sweet to me."
To be placed
outside the door of one's own home is a great grace, for it
gently compels us to stop living unto ourselves. "When
we are brought to misery we have no desire to gaze at ourselves,
and we turn our gaze towards the One beloved. The good God does
not compel us to remain in our own society; he arranges that
we should find it so intolerable as to have to leave it. And
I see no other way of becoming free from oneself than to visit
Jesus and Mary." "How wearisome is
company when Jesus is not there!" Therese is taken at
her word when she renounces all desire for feelings or visions
in her faith. The more she offers the more God takes, until
all her feelings are hidden in God, and she is left in the darkness
of naked faith. "I have no wish to see the
good God whilst I am on earth. And yet I love Him! I also love
the Mother of God and the saints very dearly, but I do not wish
to see them either. I would rather live in faith"
Naked faith
for her is not, as with St. John of the
Cross, a transition-stage towards a condition in which the soul
can gaze upon itself without danger. They quoted to her a sentence
from St. John of the Cross, and applied it to her: "The souls
which have arrived at perfect love can contemplate their own
supernatural beauty without danger." Therese answered: "What
sort of beauty? I cannot see my beauty at all. I see only the
graces which I have received from God."
Renunciation
of one's feelings in love and faith includes renouncing the
sight of their fruit; and the specific fruitfulness of the supernatural
virtues is derived from the latter renunciation. During her
retreat before Profession, during which her Spouse seeks to
detach her from all but himself, he does indeed "lead her by fertile and magnificent country-sides, but the night
prevents her from admiring anything, and, what is worse,
from enjoying all these marvels ". "Nor
must you desire to see the fruits of your efforts, "
she writes to Marie Guerin. "Jesus likes to keep for Himself alone these little nothings which
console Him." And to the novices: "Offer
to the good God the sacrifice of never collecting your own fruits.
If it is His will that all your life long you feel repugnance
at having to suffer and being humiliated, and seeing all the
flowers of your desires and goodwill fall to the ground without
bearing fruit -- do not be disturbed."
Therese
on her sick-bed is like a tree which lets its fruit fall unregarded,
and therefore does not worry about it. "I
cannot bring myself to say, 'Dear God, this one is for the Church;
this other, dear God, for France', and so on. The good God knows
already what use He will make of my little merits; I have given
Him everything so that He may have the joy of it, and in any
case it would make me dizzy to be saying at every moment, 'Give
this to Peter, and that to Paul'. I do it quite automatically
when a Sister asks me for some special purpose, but after that
I never think of it. When I am praying for my missionary brothers,
I do not offer up my sorrows. I say simply, 'Dear God, give
them everything I wish for myself'."
When the
fruit vanishes from sight, however, it takes away the consciousness
of achievement, and leaves one feeling incapable of anything
more. Quite early she writes to Celine: "What unutterable joy to bear our crosses FEEBLY! ... The grain
of sand would set herself to the task without joy, without courage,
without strength, and all these conditions will
make the enterprise easier, it wants to work for love."
"Here are we wanting to suffer generously,
greatly... What folly!... We want never to fall? What does it
matter, my Jesus, if I fall at every instant, for thereby I
see my weakness, and that for me is great gain."
Not until
we are suffering without display, but suffering in weakness,
are we really suffering with Our Lord: "It is very consoling to remember that Jesus, the God of Might,
knew our weaknesses, that He shuddered at the sight of the
bitter cup, the cup that earlier He had so ardently desired
to drink." The desire for martyrdom may prove to be one
of those spiritual treasures which "make us unjust -- when we rest in them complacently and
think they are something great. These desires are a consolation
that Jesus sometimes grants to weak souls like mine (and such
souls are numerous) but when He does not give this consolation
it is a grace of privilege. Remember the words of
the Father [the Jesuit, Pichon], 'Martyrs have suffered with
joy, and the King of Martyrs suffered with sorrow' . . . Are
you not ready to suffer whatever the good God wants? I know
well that you are; then if you want to feel joy in suffering,
to be drawn to it, what you seek is your own consolation, for
when one loves a thing, the pain vanishes -- one must consent
to stay always poor and without strength, and that's the difficulty,
for where are we to find the man truly poor in spirit ... Ah!
Do let us stay very far from all that is brilliant, let
us love our littleness, love to feel nothing, then we shall
be poor in spirit." "Please understand
that to love J |